Congenital dislocation of the knee complicated with bilateral hip dislocation: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Congenital dislocation of the knee is characterised by excessive knee extension or dislocation and anterior subluxation of the proximal tibia, and this disease can occur independently or coexist with different systemic syndromes. Nevertheless, significant controversy surrounds treating this disease when combined with hip dislocation. This paper presents a case of a 4-month-old patient diagnosed with bilateral hip dislocation combined with this disease. The study discusses the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment methods and reviews relevant literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported a case of a 4-month-old female infant with congenital dislocation of the right knee joint, which presented as flexion deformity since birth. Due to limitations in local medical conditions, she did not receive proper and effective diagnosis and treatment. Although the flexion deformity of her right knee joint partially improved without treatment, it did not fully recover to normal. When she was 4 months old, she came to our hospital for consultation, and we found that she also had congenital dislocation of both hip joints and atrial septal defect. We performed staged treatment for her, with the first stage involving surgical intervention and plaster orthosis for her congenital dislocation of the right knee joint, and the second stage involving closed reduction and plaster fixation orthosis for her congenital hip joint dislocation. Currently, the overall treatment outcome is satisfactory, and she is still under follow-up observation. CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of treatment is generally advised, as nonsurgical methods prove satisfactory for mild cases. However, surgical intervention should be considered in cases with severe stiffness, unresponsive outcomes to conservative treatment, persistent deformities, or diagnoses and treatments occurring beyond the first month after birth.

Knee dislocations with vascular injuries - a review article.

Knee dislocations are complex and devastating injuries that are potentially limb threatening. A high level of suspicion is required to diagnose and treat these injuries properly and timely because some of the knee dislocations spontaneously reduce, and the seriousness of the injury might not be appreciated early. Early diagnosis of concomitant vascular injuries is imperative to avoid limb loss because the risk of amputation is high when diagnosis and timely intervention are delayed. It is recommended that serial ankle-brachial index (ABI) be performed in all patients with suspected knee dislocation. This is particularly important in fracture dislocations, high-energy trauma, morbidly obese patients, lateral sided injuries, concomitant peroneal nerve injuries and fracture in the ipsilateral limb because these were demonstrated to be associated with a high risk of concomitant vascular injuries in knee dislocations. In cases where serial ABI cannot be performed, in high-risk patients and ABI less-than 0.9, a CT angiography should be performed.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Documented Knee Dislocation Versus Multiligamentous Knee Injury: A Comparison of KD3 Injuries at Mean 6.5 Years Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has found that the incidence of neurovascular injury is greatest among multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) with documented knee dislocation (KD). However, it is unknown whether there is a comparative difference in functional recovery based on evidence of a true dislocation. PURPOSE: To determine whether the knee dislocation-3 (KD3) injury pattern of MLKI with documented tibiofemoral dislocation represents a more severe injury than KD3 MLKI without documented dislocation, as manifested by poorer clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who underwent surgical treatment for KD3 MLKI between May 2012 and February 2021. Outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Documented dislocation was defined as a radiographically confirmed tibiofemoral disarticulation, the equivalent radiology report from outside transfer, or emergency department documentation of a knee reduction maneuver. Subgroup analysis was performed comparing lateral (KD3-L) versus medial (KD3-M) injuries. Multivariable linear regression was conducted to determine whether documented dislocation was predictive of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (25 male, 17 female) were assessed at a mean 6.5-year follow-up (range, 2.1-10.7 years). Twenty patients (47.6%) were found to have a documented KD; they reported significantly lower IKDC (49.9 vs 63.0; P = .043), Lysholm (59.8 vs 74.5; P = .023), and Tegner activity level (2.9 vs 4.7; P = .027) scores than the patients without documented dislocation. VAS pain was not significantly different between groups (36.4 vs 33.5; P = .269). The incidence of neurovascular injury was greater among those with documented dislocation (45.0% vs 13.6%; P = .040). Subgroup analysis found that patients with KD3-L injuries experienced a greater deficit in Tegner activity level than patients with KD3-M injuries (Δ: -3.4 vs -1.2; P = .006) and had an increased incidence of neurovascular injury (41.7% vs 11.1%; P = .042). Documented dislocation status was predictive of poorer IKDC (ß = -2.15; P = .038) and Lysholm (ß = -2.85; P = .007) scores. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing surgical management of KD3 injuries with true, documented KD had significantly worse clinical and functional outcomes than those with nondislocated joints at a mean 6.5-year follow-up. The current MLKI classification based solely on ligament involvement may be obscuring outcome research by not accounting for true dislocation.

Open injuries and obesity as emerging risk factors for vascular injury in knee dislocations: A retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Knee dislocations (KDs) are rare in orthopaedic trauma but can have devastating effects. Failing to diagnose a concomitant vascular injury can lead to amputation. Different methods are used for the diagnosis of a vascular injury and the best approach is under debate. This study aims to examine the risk factor(s) of vascular injury in patients with KDs, examine variables that differ between obese patients and non-obese patients with KDs, and analyse the modalities used to identify vascular injuries in the KD population. METHODS: The electronic patient medical record system at a major trauma centre was retrospectively reviewed to identify knee dislocations from 2015 to 2022. These were stratified based on age, gender, BMI, mechanism of injury, vascular injury, non-vascular complications, and laterality. Co-variates were inputted into a univariable regression analysis, followed by a multivariable regression analysis to identify risk factors of vascular injury in patients with knee dislocations. Co-variates were also compared between obese and non-obese patients using two-tailed t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Forty patients were identified with a KD, with twenty-eight males and twelve females. The average age was 42.9 years, seventeen patients had a BMI of thirty or over, and eleven patients (27.5%) had a vascular injury. Open injuries (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.19-11.30; p = 0.038) and obesity (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.45-18.69; p = 0.027) are risk factors for vascular injury in patients with knee dislocation. Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had a higher rate of open injury (p = 0.028), vascular injury (p = 0.017), low-energy injuries (p = 0.014), non-vascular complications (p = 0.017), and amputation (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Open injuries and obesity are risk factors for vascular injury in patients with KD. Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients have low-energy injuries and an increased rate of non-vascular complications, meaning that clinicians could err on the side of caution when investigating vascular injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Magnetic resonance imaging quality in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator placed inside the MR bore: a literature review.

After emergent assessment of potentially limb-threatening injuries in knee dislocation or multi-ligament knee injury patients, magnetic resonance imaging is necessary to visualize ligamentous structures and plan for soft tissue repair. However, the application of a knee-spanning external fixator may introduce artifact and reduce overall image quality, which can limit the evaluation of soft tissue injury. As a result, the utility of MRI in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator has been called into question. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitative scales have been used to assess image quality of MRI in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator. Despite the potential for artifact, studies have demonstrated that useful diagnostic information may be obtained from MRI in the presence of an external fixator. This review examines the general principles of anatomical assessment, magnetic field strength, device composition and design, radiofrequency coil use, and MRI sequences and artifact reduction as they pertain to MRI in the presence of a knee-spanning external fixator.

[Treatment of acute knee dislocations]. / Behandlung der akuten Knieluxation.

A knee dislocation is a serious injury involving at least two of the four major ligamentous stabilizers of the knee. This injury results in multidirectional knee instability. In dislocation of the knee the popliteal artery and the peroneal nerve can also be damaged. Dislocations with vascular involvement are potentially threatening injuries of the lower extremities. The diagnosis of knee dislocation can be difficult due to a high rate of spontaneous reduction at the initial examination. Knee dislocations are rare and mainly occur in young men. They are mostly caused by high-energy trauma; however, they can also be caused by low-energy injuries. Obesity increases the risk of knee dislocations. The classification of a knee dislocation is based on the anatomical structures involved and the direction of dislocation. The acute treatment includes reduction and stabilization measures. Associated injuries, such as vascular, nerve, extensor mechanism and cartilage injuries as well as fractures and meniscal injuries can influence the treatment approach and the outcome. The definitive surgical treatment depends on the severity of the injury and can include ligament reconstruction or repair with bracing. The aftercare should be individually adapted with the aim to restore knee joint stability and function. Complications such as arthrofibrosis, peroneal nerve palsy, compartment syndrome, postoperative infection and recurrent instability can occur. In the long term, patients have an increased risk for the development of symptomatic osteoarthritis.

Irreducible knee dislocation: improved clinical outcomes of open and arthroscopic surgical treatment. A systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Irreducible knee dislocations (IKDs) are a rare rotatory category of knee dislocations (KDs) characterized by medial soft tissue entrapment that requires early surgical treatment. This systematic review underlines the need for prompt surgical reduction of IKDs, either open or arthroscopically. It describes the various surgical options for ligament management following knee reduction, and it investigates their respective functional outcome scores to assist orthopedic surgeons in adequately managing this rare but harmful KD. METHODS: A comprehensive search in four databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and MEDLINE, was performed, and following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Studies with LoE 5 were excluded, and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the ROBINS-I tool system. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all data extracted. RESULTS: Four studies were included in the qualitative analysis for a total of 49 patients enrolled. The dimple sign was present in most cases. The surgical reduction, either open or arthroscopically performed, appeared to be the only way to disengage the entrapped medial structures. After the reduction, torn ligaments were addressed in a single acute or a double-staged procedure with improved functional outcome scores and ROM. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review underlines the importance of promptly reducing IKDs through a surgical procedure, either open or arthroscopically. Moreover, torn ligaments should be handled with either a single acute or a double-staged procedure, leading to improved outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Multiligament knee injuries. Ten years' experience at a public university, level I Trauma Center.

PURPOSE: To describe our institutional experience and results in the surgical management of multiligament knee injuries (MLKI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective series of MLKI consecutively operated on at a single, level I Trauma Center. Data on patients' baseline characteristics, injuries, treatments, and outcomes were recorded up to one-year follow-up. Recorded outcomes included the Tegner-Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (TLKSS), return to work, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: MLKI incidence was 0.03% among 9897 orthopedic trauma admissions. Twenty-four patients of mean age 43.6 years were included in analysis. The mean Injury Severity Score was 12.6. Five patients presented with knee dislocations and six had fracture-dislocations, two of them open fractures. There was one popliteal artery injury requiring a bypass and four common peroneal nerve palsies. Staged ligamental reconstruction was performed in all cases. There were seven postoperative complications. The median TLKSS was 80 and, though patient satisfaction was high, and dissatisfaction was largely restricted to recreational activities (only 58.3% satisfied). Seventeen patients returned to their previous employment. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high aggregation of fracture-dislocations secondary to road traffic accidents. One in four patients experienced complications, particularly stiffness. Complications were more common in cases involving knee dislocation. Most patients had good functional results, but 25% were unable to return to their previous work, which demonstrates the long-lasting sequelae of this injury.

Two-stage ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation as treatment of knee dislocation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two-stage reconstruction (peripheral reconstruction in phase I and central anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) / posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in phase II) with remnant preservation for patients with knee dislocation. METHODS: A total of 70 patients (10 IIIM, 17 IIIL, and 43 IV) with knee dislocation were randomly divided into the remnant-preserved group and the simple reconstruction group. Patients underwent two-stage reconstruction, including the reconstruction of collateral ligament in phase I and the reconstruction of ACL/PCL in phase II (12 weeks after phase I). Grafts were harvested from the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons from both lower limbs. After the surgery, the joint flexion and extension, bone tunnel and ligament healing, and joint stability were evaluated. RESULTS: After the surgery, the lateral stability recovered in all patients, and X-ray revealed a good position of bone tunnel. Follow-up was performed at 12 months postoperatively and ranged from 24 to 91 months. At the final follow-up, knee flexion angle, IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores were all higher in both groups compared to the preoperative period. Notably, the remnant-preserved group showed superior results in these parameters compared to the simple reconstruction group. There was statistical significance between the two groups in terms of the Lachman test. CONCLUSION: The knee function was well recovered after two-stage ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation.

Higher success rate observed in reconstruction techniques of acute posterolateral corner knee injuries as compared to repair: an updated systematic review.

PURPOSE: There remains controversy regarding the optimal surgical treatment for acute complete (grade III) posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the contemporary literature regarding surgical options and subsequent outcomes of acute grade III PLC injuries. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the following search terms: posterolateral corner knee, posterolateral knee, posterolateral instability, multi-ligament knee, and knee dislocation. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies with level I-IV evidence, reporting on human patients with acute grade III PLC injuries undergoing operative management within 4 weeks from injury, with subjective and/or objective outcomes (including varus stress examinations or varus stress radiographs) reported at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two investigators independently performed the search by sequentially screening articles. Accepted definitions of varus stability on examination or stress radiographs and revision surgery were used to determine success and failure of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, consisting of 288 patients were included. Ten studies reported primary repair, while reconstruction techniques were reported in seven studies. Overall, 43% (n = 125/288) of injuries involved the PLC, ACL and PCL. Staged reconstruction was reported in 25% (n = 3/12) of studies. The Lysholm score was the most commonly reported outcome measure. An overall failure rate of 12.4% (n = 35/282) was observed. Surgical failure was significantly higher in patients undergoing repair (21.9%; n = 21/96) compared to reconstruction (7.1%; n = 6/84) (p = 0.0058). Return to sport was greater in patients undergoing reconstruction (100%; n = 22/22) compared to repair (94%; n = 48/51) (n.s). The most common post-operative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia (8.7%; n = 25/288). A total of 3.8% (n = 11/288) of patients underwent revision PLC reconstruction. CONCLUSION: There remains substantial heterogeneity in the surgical techniques of acute, grade III PLC injuries with an overall failure rate of 12.4%. Failure rates were significantly lower, and return to sport rates higher in patients undergoing PLC reconstruction compared to repair. The most common postoperative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

[Multiligament instabilities of the knee in sports injuries : An update of the Hamburg concept]. / Multiligamentäre Instabilitäten des Kniegelenkes bei Sportverletzungen : Ein Update zum "Hamburger Konzept".

BACKGROUND: Knee dislocation (KD) is a rare but severe injury of the knee joint, with a high rate of concomitant neurovascular injuries. The severity of the ligamentous injury, which is classified according to the Schenck classification, the mechanism of injury, concomitant injuries and individual factors determine the treatment strategy in KD. TREATMENT STRATEGY: Furthermore, a clear differentiation between high-velocity (HV) and low-velocity (LV) injuries is necessary. Generally, surgical treatment within 7-10 days should be aspired. Herein, the one-stage hybrid treatment using augmented ligament sutures (ligament bracing) in combination with primary ligament reconstruction (posterolateral and ACL) leads to very good functional results in the mid-term. Ultra-low-velocity (ULV) dislocations and those with concomitant peroneal lesions require a modified approach, due to a limited prognosis. During rehabilitation, the individual progress must be closely monitored and follow an early functional approach. In approximately 20% of all cases, early arthroscopic arthrolysis shows a high success rate.

Supine Lobenhoffer Approach Optimizes PCL Reconstruction with Tibial Inlay in Knee Dislocations: A Case Report.

CASE: A 47-year-old man suffered a knee dislocation while skiing with associated damage to the anterior cruciate, posterior cruciate, medial collateral, and medial patellofemoral ligaments. The patient underwent a multiple-ligament knee reconstruction using the supine Lobenhoffer approach, which resulted in remarkable outcomes that persisted throughout the 56-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The utilization of this approach can prevent inappropriate graft tension and iatrogenic damage, reduce surgical time, and minimize airway complications by eliminating the need for the prone position. Optimizing these factors enhances the patient's chances for long-term outcomes; thus, surgeons should consider this approach in managing multiple-ligament knee injuries.

Outside-in repair technique is effective in traumatic tears of the meniscus in active adults: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Meniscal injuries are common. Outside-in meniscal repair is one of the techniques advocated for the management of traumatic meniscal tears. This systematic review investigated the outcomes of the outside-in repair technique for the management of traumatic tears of the menisci. The outcomes of interest were to investigate whether PROMs improved and to evaluate the rate of complications. METHODS: Following the 2020 PRISMA statement, in May 2023, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed with no time constraints. All the clinical investigations which reported data on meniscal repair using the outside-in technique were considered for inclusion. Only studies which reported data on acute traumatic meniscal tears in adults were considered. Only studies which reported a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were eligible. RESULTS: Data from 458 patients were extracted. 34% (155 of 458) were women. 65% (297 of 458) of tears involved the medial meniscus. The mean operative time was 52.9 ± 13.6 min. Patients returned to their normal activities at 4.8 ± 0.8 months. At a mean of 67-month follow-up, all PROMs of interest improved: Tegner scale (P = 0.003), Lysholm score (P < 0.0001), International Knee Documentation Committee (P < 0.0001). 5.9% (27 of 458) of repairs were considered failures. Four of 186 (2.2%) patients experienced a re-injury, and 5 of 458 (1.1%) patients required re-operation. CONCLUSION: Meniscal repair using the outside-in technique can be effectively performed to improve the quality of life and the activity level of patients with acute meniscal tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Establishing a Consensus Definition of a Knee Fracture-Dislocation (Schenck Knee Dislocation V) Using a Global Modified Delphi Method.

BACKGROUND: Knee fracture-dislocations are complex injuries; however, there is no universally accepted definition of what constitutes a fracture-dislocation within the Schenck Knee Dislocation (KD) V subcategory. The purpose of this study was to establish a more precise definition for fracture patterns included within the Schenck KD V subcategory. METHODS: A series of clinical scenarios encompassing various fracture patterns in association with a bicruciate knee ligament injury was created by a working group of 8 surgeons. Utilizing a modified Delphi technique, 46 surgeons from 18 countries and 6 continents with clinical and academic expertise in multiligamentous knee injuries undertook 3 rounds of online surveys to establish consensus. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement with responses of either "strongly agree" or "agree" for a positive consensus or "strongly disagree" or "disagree" for a negative consensus. RESULTS: There was a 100% response rate for Rounds 1 and 2 and a 96% response rate for Round 3. A total of 11 fracture patterns reached consensus for inclusion: (1) nondisplaced articular fracture of the femur; (2) displaced articular fracture of the femur; (3) tibial plateau fracture involving the weight-bearing surface (with or without tibial spine involvement); (4) tibial plateau peripheral rim compression fracture; (5) posterolateral tibial plateau compression fracture, Bernholt type IIB; (6) posterolateral tibial plateau compression fracture, Bernholt type IIIA; (7) posterolateral tibial plateau compression fracture, Bernholt type IIIB; (8) Gerdy's tubercle avulsion fracture with weight-bearing surface involvement; (9) displaced tibial tubercle fracture; (10) displaced patellar body fracture; and (11) displaced patellar inferior pole fracture. Fourteen fracture patterns reached consensus for exclusion from the definition. Two fracture patterns failed to reach consensus for either inclusion or exclusion from the definition. CONCLUSIONS: Using a modified Delphi technique, this study established consensus for specific fracture patterns to include within or exclude from the Schenck KD V subcategory. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level V . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Luxación femorotibial de rodilla: manejo, posibles complicaciones y secuelas / Femorotibial knee dislocation: management, possible complications and aftermath

La luxación femorotibial es una situación clínica rara, causada normalmente por accidentes de alta energía, pero también por accidentes de baja energía en personas obesas. Es susceptible de ser atendida inicialmente en todos los puntos de acceso al sistema, tanto en Atención Primaria como en puntos de atención continuada, emergencias o en urgencias hospitalarias. Frecuentemente tratada en ámbitos de traumatología, ha sido una lesión poco referida en ámbitos de urgencias y de Atención Primaria. Tanto las lesiones vasculares o nerviosas que puede causar y que ponen en riesgo la viabilidad de la extremidad, como las lesiones musculoesqueléticas que pueden condicionar probables secuelas a largo plazo y que marcarán la relación médico-paciente, hacen de esta lesión una auténtica emergencia médica. Por ello, su correcto manejo precoz, con una valoración neurosensorial prioritaria, una valoración radiológica, una reducción y una inmovilización adecuadas previas al tratamiento definitivo, es determinante para su evolución.(AU)

Femorotibial dislocation is a rare clinical situation, usually caused by high-energy accidents, but also by low-energy accidents in obese people. It is likely to be treated initially at all points of access to the system, both by the family physician, continuous care points, casualty or by the hospital A&E physician. Commonly treated by orthopaedic surgeons, it has been a rarely reported injury in emergency or primary care medicine. Both vascular or neuropathic injuries that can cause and put the limb’s viability at risk, as well as musculoskeletal injuries that can lead to probable long-term sequelae that will determine the relationship between physician and patient, make this injury a real medical emergency. For this reason, its correct early management with priority neurosensory evaluation, a radiological evaluation, suitable reduction and immobilization prior to definitive treatment, becomes decisive for its prognosis.(AU)

Subchondral insufficiency fracture is a predictive factor of osteoarthritis progression and conversion to arthroplasty in non-surgically treated medial meniscus root tear.

PURPOSE: To investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of non-surgical treatment for medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT), and prognostic factors for osteoarthritis (OA) progression and clinical failure. METHODS: A prospectively collected database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who were diagnosed with acute medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) between 2013 and 2021 and treated non-surgically for more than 2 years. Patient demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes including pain numeric rating scale (NRS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale were evaluated. For radiographic evaluation, knee radiographs were obtained to assess the angle of knee alignment and Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade during the first and annually follow-up visits. Baseline magnetic resonance (MR) images were reviewed for the presence of medial meniscus extrusion, bone marrow edema, subchondral insufficiency fracture of medial femoral condyle, and cartilage lesion. The OA progression group was defined as patients who experienced a worsening of one or more grades in the K-L classification system. Prognostic factors were evaluated for OA progression and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (90 female and 4 male) with a mean age of 67.0 ± 7.3 years (range, 53-83 years) were followed for a mean of 46.1 ± 22.1 months (range, 24.1-170.5). During the follow-up period, no significant differences in clinical scores were observed, and there were also no significant differences between the groups with and without OA progression. Overall, 12 patients (13%) underwent TKA at a mean of 20.7 ± 16.5 months (range, 8-69 months) and 34 patients (36%) demonstrated OA progression at a mean time of 24 ± 15 months (range, 12-62). The subchondral insufficiency fracture was a prognostic factor for OA progression (p = 0.045 for knee radiograph and p = 0.019 for MR) and conversion to TKA (RR, 4.08 [95% CI 1.23-13.57]; p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Non-surgical treatment for acute medial meniscus posterior root tear did not result in any significant change in clinical outcomes from the initial to the final follow-up. The rate of conversion to arthroplasty was 13%, and the rate of osteoarthritis progression was 36%. Furthermore, subchondral insufficiency fracture was found to be a concomitant prognostic factor correlated with OA progression and conversion to arthroplasty. This information can provide insights for physicians when discussing treatment options with patients, particularly regarding the use of non-surgical treatment and may contribute as a source for future studies of medial meniscus posterior root tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Extensor Mechanism Disruption Impacts Treatment of Dislocated and Multiligament Injured Knees: Treatment and Schenck Classification Recommendations Based on a Global Delphi Method.

BACKGROUND: Multiligament knee injury (MLKI) with associated extensor mechanism (EM) involvement is a rare injury, with limited evidence to guide optimal treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify areas of consensus among a group of international experts regarding the treatment of patients with MLKI and concomitant EM injury. METHODS: Utilizing a classic Delphi technique, an international group of 46 surgeons from 6 continents with expertise in MLKI undertook 3 rounds of online surveys. Participants were presented with clinical scenarios involving EM disruption in association with MLKI, classified using the Schenck Knee-Dislocation (KD) Classification. Positive consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement with responses of either "strongly agree" or "agree," and negative consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement with "strongly disagree" or "disagree." RESULTS: There was a 100% response rate for rounds 1 and 2 and a 96% response rate for round 3. There was strong positive consensus (87%) that an EM injury in combination with MLKI significantly alters the treatment algorithm. For an EM injury in conjunction with a KD2, KD3M, or KD3L injury, there was positive consensus to repair the EM injury only and negative consensus regarding performing concurrent ligamentous reconstruction at the time of initial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of bicruciate MLKI, there was overall agreement on the significant impact of EM injury on the treatment algorithm. We therefore recommend that the Schenck KD Classification be updated with the addition of the modifier suffix "-EM" to highlight this impact. Treatment of the EM injury was judged to have the highest priority, and there was consensus to treat the EM injury only. However, given the lack of clinical outcome data, treatment decisions need to be made on a case-by-case basis with consideration of the numerous clinical factors that are encountered. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Little clinical evidence exists to guide the surgeon on the management of EM injury in the setting of a multiligament injured or dislocated knee. This survey highlights the impact that EM injury has on the treatment algorithm and provides some guidance for management until a further large case series or prospective studies are undertaken.

[MCL tear with intra-articular dislocation]. / MCL-Ruptur mit intraartikulärer Dislokation.

A 48-year-old male patient presented with inner skin retraction after a sports accident involving the knee. In a multi-ligament injury it must be assumed that knee dislocation has occurred. Inner skin retraction after knee distortion can result from an intra-articular dislocation of the ruptured medial collateral ligament. Prompt reduction and exclusion of concomitant neurovascular injuries is thus obligatory. After surgical reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament, instability was no longer apparent 3 months postoperatively.

A Young Skier with Leg Pain.

BACKGROUND: Proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) dislocation is a rare injury that can disrupt the proximal tibia-fibula joint. The abnormalities in knee x-ray imaging can be subtle and difficult to detect, requiring careful assessment. This rare cause of lateral knee pain requires a high level of suspicion for diagnosis. Treatment is closed reduction; unstable PTFJ dislocations often require surgical intervention. CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old young man presented to the emergency department (ED) with right lateral knee pain and difficulty walking after colliding with another skier 2 days prior. The examination showed right lateral ecchymosis and tenderness over the lateral proximal fibula. He remained neurovascularly intact with a full passive and active range of motion. X-ray studies were obtained. The patient was referred by his outpatient orthopedic surgeon after the initial knee x-ray study was concerning for PTFJ dislocation and unsuccessful reduction. In the ED, the patient underwent moderate sedation and successful orthopedic-guided reduction via medial force on the lateral fibular head, while hyper-flexing the knee and holding the foot dorsiflexed and everted. Post-reduction radiographs showed improved proximal tibiofibular alignment without fracture. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: PTFJ dislocation is a rare injury that can be missed easily and requires a high level of suspicion when presented with an acute traumatic knee pain. Closed reduction of PTFJ dislocation can be achieved in the ED and early identification can prevent long-term sequelae.